On 2013-09-22 11:53, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:53:14AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/09/2013 09:42, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock
On 13-09-22 05:53 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:53:14AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/09/2013 09:42, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock
Il 23/09/2013 15:36, Paul Gortmaker ha scritto:
The change is not completely trivial, it splits lock. There is no
obvious problem of course, otherwise you wouldn't send it and I
would ack it :), but it does not mean that the chance for problem is
zero, so why risk stability of stable even
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:44:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/09/2013 15:36, Paul Gortmaker ha scritto:
The change is not completely trivial, it splits lock. There is no
obvious problem of course, otherwise you wouldn't send it and I
would ack it :), but it does not mean that the
Il 23/09/2013 16:59, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
Perfect, I'll queue [v2 of] these patches for 3.12 then.
Why 3.12 if it is not going to stable?
Off-by-one. :)
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan. He provided a
patch that shrunk the kvm_lock critical section so that the mmu_lock
critical section does
Il 22/09/2013 09:42, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan. He provided a
patch that shrunk the kvm_lock critical
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:53:14AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/09/2013 09:42, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:04:19PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-09-20 19:51, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw] On 16/09/2013 (Mon 18:12) Paul
Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw] On 16/09/2013 (Mon 18:12) Paul
Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan. He provided a
patch
On 13-09-20 02:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-09-20 19:51, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw] On 16/09/2013 (Mon 18:12) Paul
Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking
On 2013-09-20 20:18, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-09-20 02:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-09-20 19:51, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw] On 16/09/2013 (Mon 18:12) Paul
Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported
On 2013-09-20 19:51, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw] On 16/09/2013 (Mon 18:12) Paul
Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan. He provided a
patch that shrunk the kvm_lock critical section so that the mmu_lock
critical section does not nest with it, but in the end there is no reason
for the vm_list
On 13-09-16 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan. He provided a
patch that shrunk the kvm_lock critical section so that the mmu_lock
critical section does not nest with it, but
15 matches
Mail list logo