Il 16/06/2014 13:25, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>
> If you reorder the first three patches as 2 then 3 then 1, you do not
> need to temporarily break CR3 access interception. There is no
> conflict, just changes in the context. Does that look good to you?
Fine with me, but I guess I should adjust
On 2014-06-16 12:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 15/06/2014 16:18, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> Nothing critical, but it further improves emulation accuracy,
>> specifically helpful when analyzing guest bugs...
>>
>> Corresponding kvm-unit-tests will be provided.
>>
>> Jan Kiszka (5):
>> KVM: nVMX: Fi
Il 15/06/2014 16:18, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
Nothing critical, but it further improves emulation accuracy,
specifically helpful when analyzing guest bugs...
Corresponding kvm-unit-tests will be provided.
Jan Kiszka (5):
KVM: nVMX: Fix returned value of MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS
KVM: nVMX:
Nothing critical, but it further improves emulation accuracy,
specifically helpful when analyzing guest bugs...
Corresponding kvm-unit-tests will be provided.
Jan Kiszka (5):
KVM: nVMX: Fix returned value of MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS
KVM: nVMX: Advertise support for MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_*_CTLS
