On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:33:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Gleb,
>
> I am just curious, have you given these patches some stress testing with all
> kinds of Windows guests? To my experience they break very fast if something is
> wrong with interrupts ;)
>
I tested VMX with windows XP/vist
Hi Gleb,
I am just curious, have you given these patches some stress testing with all
kinds of Windows guests? To my experience they break very fast if something is
wrong with interrupts ;)
Joerg
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:55:30PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series aims to c
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:20:04AM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Monday 13 April 2009 19:51:59 Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch series aims to consolidate IRQ injection code for in kernel
> > > IRQ chip and userspace one. Also to move IRQ injection logic fr
On Monday 13 April 2009 19:51:59 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series aims to consolidate IRQ injection code for in kernel
> > IRQ chip and userspace one. Also to move IRQ injection logic from
> > SVM/VMX specific code to x86.c.
>
> Very nice patchset, removes c
Gleb Natapov wrote:
Hi,
This patch series aims to consolidate IRQ injection code for in kernel
IRQ chip and userspace one. Also to move IRQ injection logic from
SVM/VMX specific code to x86.c.
Very nice patchset, removes code, consolidates functionality, and fixes
bugs.
Joerg and Sheng,
Hi,
This patch series aims to consolidate IRQ injection code for in kernel
IRQ chip and userspace one. Also to move IRQ injection logic from
SVM/VMX specific code to x86.c.
Gleb Natapov (15):
Make kvm_cpu_(has|get)_interrupt() work for userspace irqchip too.
Consolidate userspace and kernel i
