On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 02:13:36PM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
> Am 04.07.2011 12:37, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> >On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:31:11PM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
> >>SYS_eventfd2 is not defined on systems with old glibc. These numbers
> >>are working for me, for 32 and 64 bit linu
Am 04.07.2011 12:37, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:31:11PM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
SYS_eventfd2 is not defined on systems with old glibc. These numbers
are working for me, for 32 and 64 bit linux. What means
"__NR_eventfd2 does seem to exit"?
My system seems to hav
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:31:11PM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
> SYS_eventfd2 is not defined on systems with old glibc. These numbers
> are working for me, for 32 and 64 bit linux. What means
> "__NR_eventfd2 does seem to exit"?
My system seems to have a definition for the 64 bit
_NR_eventfd2 in u
Am 03.07.2011 11:57, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:54:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
#ifndef _COMPAT_SYS_EVENTFD
#define _COMPAT_SYS_EVENTFD
#include
#include
/* Flags for signalfd. */
enum
{
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:54:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
> > #ifndef _COMPAT_SYS_EVENTFD
> > #define _COMPAT_SYS_EVENTFD
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > /* Flags for signalfd. */
> > enum
> > {
> > EFD_SEMA
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Bernhard Held wrote:
> #ifndef _COMPAT_SYS_EVENTFD
> #define _COMPAT_SYS_EVENTFD
>
> #include
> #include
>
> /* Flags for signalfd. */
> enum
> {
> EFD_SEMAPHORE = 1,
> #define EFD_SEMAPHORE EFD_SEMAPHORE
> EFD_CLOEXEC = 0200,
> #defi
Am 28.06.2011 13:09, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
No longer used.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
I think it's actually handy to build on old systems which have
a recent enough kernel but not the header.
Yep, I'm running
On 2011-06-28 14:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:11:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-28 14:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 20
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:11:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-28 14:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> F
On 2011-06-28 14:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
No longer used.
Signed-off-by: Ja
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka
> >>
> >> No longer used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> >
> > I think it's actually handy to
On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> No longer used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>
> I think it's actually handy to build on old systems which have
> a recent enough kernel but not the header.
>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> No longer used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
I think it's actually handy to build on old systems which have
a recent enough kernel but not the header.
Does it hurt much to keep it around?
> ---
> compat/sys/e
From: Jan Kiszka
No longer used.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
compat/sys/eventfd.h | 13 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 compat/sys/eventfd.h
diff --git a/compat/sys/eventfd.h b/compat/sys/eventfd.h
deleted file mode 100644
index f55d96a.
14 matches
Mail list logo