On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:23 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
>> I'm slightly surprised this isn't called from postprocess
>> in the test? Any downside to doing that?
>
> In the second patch I do the change to make the test to use the
> p
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:23 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> I'm slightly surprised this isn't called from postprocess
> in the test? Any downside to doing that?
In the second patch I do the change to make the test to use the
postprocessing module.
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Lucas Meneghel Ro
I'm slightly surprised this isn't called from postprocess
in the test? Any downside to doing that?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
wrote:
> This module contains code to postprocess IOzone data
> in a convenient way so we can generate performance graphs
> and condensed da
This module contains code to postprocess IOzone data
in a convenient way so we can generate performance graphs
and condensed data. The graph generation part depends
on gnuplot, but if the utility is not present,
functionality will gracefully degrade.
The reason why this was created as a separate m
