If we pass just enough entries to KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, we would still
fail with -E2BIG due to wrong comparisons.
Cc: Avi Kivity
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:18:44PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> If we pass just enough entries to KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, we would still
> fail with -E2BIG due to wrong comparisons.
>
> Cc: Avi Kivity
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++--
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 08:09 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:18:44PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > If we pass just enough entries to KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, we would still
> > fail with -E2BIG due to wrong comparisons.
> >
> > Cc: Avi Kivity
> > Cc: Marcelo Tosatti
> >
On 11/24/2011 12:31 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> > The protocol goes like "try size x, if it fails with -E2BIG, increase x,
> > try again". Its awkward.
>
> We can set nent to be the amount of entries required like we do in the
> opposite case where we passed too many entries.
There's no point, s
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 12:33 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 12:31 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >
> > > The protocol goes like "try size x, if it fails with -E2BIG, increase x,
> > > try again". Its awkward.
> >
> > We can set nent to be the amount of entries required like we do in the
> > o
On 11/24/2011 12:37 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 12:33 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 11/24/2011 12:31 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The protocol goes like "try size x, if it fails with -E2BIG, increase x,
> > > > try again". Its awkward.
> > >
> > > We can set nent to
