Il 26/06/2013 20:36, Mathias Krause ha scritto:
Use a const pointer type instead of casting away the const qualifier
from const arrays. Keep the pointer array on the stack, nonetheless.
Making it static just increases the object size.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause mini...@googlemail.com
---
On 27 June 2013 15:33, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 26/06/2013 20:36, Mathias Krause ha scritto:
Use a const pointer type instead of casting away the const qualifier
from const arrays. Keep the pointer array on the stack, nonetheless.
Making it static just increases the object
Il 27/06/2013 15:42, Mathias Krause ha scritto:
The const int is not particularly useful, but doesn't hurt either.
It's more of a hint for the compiler to take the values verbatim
instead of allocating stack space for them. But it'll probably already
do it even without that hint.
It won't
Use a const pointer type instead of casting away the const qualifier
from const arrays. Keep the pointer array on the stack, nonetheless.
Making it static just increases the object size.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause mini...@googlemail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 15 +++
1 file
