On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
+ slb = vcpu-arch.slb_shadow.pinned_addr;
+ if (!slb)
+
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
+
On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they
On 26.11.2012, at 22:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.11.2012, at 22:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
+ slb = vcpu-arch.slb_shadow.pinned_addr;
+ if (!slb)
+
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
+
On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they
On 26.11.2012, at 22:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.11.2012, at 22:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 26.11.2012, at 22:33, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:15:16PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 22:42, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Currently, if a machine check interrupt happens while we are in the
guest, we exit the guest and call the host's machine check handler,
which tends to cause the host to panic. Some machine checks can be
triggered by the guest; for example, if
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
+ slb = vcpu-arch.slb_shadow.pinned_addr;
+ if (!slb)
+ return;
Mind to explain this case? What
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Currently, if a machine check interrupt happens while we are in the
guest, we exit the guest and call the host's machine check handler,
which tends to cause the host to panic. Some machine checks can be
triggered by the guest; for example, if
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 03:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.11.2012, at 10:25, Paul Mackerras wrote:
+ /* Do they have an SLB shadow buffer registered? */
+ slb = vcpu-arch.slb_shadow.pinned_addr;
+ if (!slb)
+ return;
Mind to explain this case? What
Currently, if a machine check interrupt happens while we are in the
guest, we exit the guest and call the host's machine check handler,
which tends to cause the host to panic. Some machine checks can be
triggered by the guest; for example, if the guest creates two entries
in the SLB that map the
Currently, if a machine check interrupt happens while we are in the
guest, we exit the guest and call the host's machine check handler,
which tends to cause the host to panic. Some machine checks can be
triggered by the guest; for example, if the guest creates two entries
in the SLB that map the
16 matches
Mail list logo