Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2012-01-15 13:50, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/15/2012 02:49 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 01/15/2012 02:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2012-01-15 13:35, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/15/2012 12:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-01-15 11:49, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivi

Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Avi Kivity
On 01/15/2012 02:49 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/15/2012 02:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2012-01-15 13:35, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 01/15/2012 12:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >> On 2012-01-15 11:49, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >>> On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivity wrote: > > Drop the use of cpu_

Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Avi Kivity
On 01/15/2012 02:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-01-15 13:35, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 01/15/2012 12:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2012-01-15 11:49, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivity wrote: > Drop the use of cpu_register_phys_memory_client() in favour of the new > >

Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2012-01-15 13:35, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/15/2012 12:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-01-15 11:49, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivity wrote: Drop the use of cpu_register_phys_memory_client() in favour of the new MemoryListener API. The new API simplifies the ca

Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Avi Kivity
On 01/15/2012 12:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-01-15 11:49, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Drop the use of cpu_register_phys_memory_client() in favour of the new > >> MemoryListener API. The new API simplifies the caller, since there is no > >> need to deal

Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2012-01-15 11:49, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivity wrote: >> Drop the use of cpu_register_phys_memory_client() in favour of the new >> MemoryListener API. The new API simplifies the caller, since there is no >> need to deal with splitting and merging slots; however this is no

Re: [PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2012-01-15 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-12-19 15:13, Avi Kivity wrote: > Drop the use of cpu_register_phys_memory_client() in favour of the new > MemoryListener API. The new API simplifies the caller, since there is no > need to deal with splitting and merging slots; however this is not exploited > in this patch. This breaks gr

[PATCH 13/23] kvm: convert to MemoryListener API

2011-12-19 Thread Avi Kivity
Drop the use of cpu_register_phys_memory_client() in favour of the new MemoryListener API. The new API simplifies the caller, since there is no need to deal with splitting and merging slots; however this is not exploited in this patch. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- kvm-all.c | 107