On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:12:34AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 08:09 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >
> >>We don't want to enter the emulator for non-string in/out. Leftover
> >>test code?
> >>
> >No, unfortunately this is not leftover. I just don't see a way how we
> >can bypass emulator
On 03/09/2010 08:09 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
We don't want to enter the emulator for non-string in/out. Leftover
test code?
No, unfortunately this is not leftover. I just don't see a way how we
can bypass emulator and still have emulator be able to emulate in/out
(for big real mode for
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 04:09 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >in/out emulation is broken now. The breakage is different depending
> >on where IO device resides. If it is in userspace emulator reports
> >emulation failure since it incorrectly interprets
On 03/09/2010 04:09 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
in/out emulation is broken now. The breakage is different depending
on where IO device resides. If it is in userspace emulator reports
emulation failure since it incorrectly interprets kvm_emulate_pio()
return value. If IO device is in the kernel emulat
in/out emulation is broken now. The breakage is different depending
on where IO device resides. If it is in userspace emulator reports
emulation failure since it incorrectly interprets kvm_emulate_pio()
return value. If IO device is in the kernel emulation of 'in' will do
nothing since kvm_emulate_
