On 2013-03-14 16:37, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 04:24:18PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-03-14 16:12, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
nothing p
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 04:24:18PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-03-14 16:12, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
> >> nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's e
On 2013-03-14 14:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
>> nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's events and they
>> would get lost. This check is conceptually indepen
On 2013-03-14 16:12, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
>> nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's events and they
>> would get lost. This check is conceptually indepen
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
> nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's events and they
> would get lost. This check is conceptually independent of
> nested_exit_on_intr.
>
> If L1 trap
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:53:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
> nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's events and they
> would get lost. This check is conceptually independent of
> nested_exit_on_intr.
>
> If L1 trap
If we are in guest mode, L0 can only inject events into L2 if L1 has
nothing pending. Otherwise, L0 would overwrite L1's events and they
would get lost. This check is conceptually independent of
nested_exit_on_intr.
If L1 traps external interrupts, then we also need to look at L1's
idt_vectoring_i
