Re: [PATCH 2/3] s390: Virtual channel subsystem support.

2012-11-20 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:30:00 +0100 Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote: On 31.10.2012, at 17:24, Cornelia Huck wrote: Provide a mechanism for qemu to provide fully virtual subchannels to the guest. In the KVM case, this relies on the kernel's css support for I/O and machine check

Re: [PATCH 2/3] s390: Virtual channel subsystem support.

2012-11-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 31.10.2012, at 17:24, Cornelia Huck wrote: Provide a mechanism for qemu to provide fully virtual subchannels to the guest. In the KVM case, this relies on the kernel's css support for I/O and machine check interrupt handling. The !KVM case handles interrupts on its own. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 2/3] s390: Virtual channel subsystem support.

2012-11-13 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:17:55 -0200 Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Cornelia, On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:24:47PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: Provide a mechanism for qemu to provide fully virtual subchannels to the guest. In the KVM case, this relies on the kernel's css

Re: [PATCH 2/3] s390: Virtual channel subsystem support.

2012-11-12 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
Hi Cornelia, On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:24:47PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: Provide a mechanism for qemu to provide fully virtual subchannels to the guest. In the KVM case, this relies on the kernel's css support for I/O and machine check interrupt handling. The !KVM case handles interrupts