On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be
On 19.12.2012, at 10:37, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:59:28AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.12.2012, at 10:37, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be
On 19.12.2012, at 10:37, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:59:28AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.12.2012, at 10:37, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest triggered.
So instead, let's only WARN() the user that this happened.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c |3 ++-
1
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an
error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest
triggered.
So instead, let's only WARN() the user that this happened.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest triggered.
So instead, let's only WARN() the user that this
On 12/18/2012 05:01:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an
error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest
On 19.12.2012, at 00:05, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 05:01:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest triggered.
So instead, let's only WARN() the user that this happened.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c |3 ++-
1
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an
error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest
triggered.
So instead, let's only WARN() the user that this happened.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest triggered.
So instead, let's only WARN() the user that this
On 12/18/2012 05:01:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an
error,
but it's nothing that warrants a BUG(), because it can be guest
On 19.12.2012, at 00:05, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 05:01:19 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.2012, at 23:54, Scott Wood wrote:
On 12/18/2012 06:38:41 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we hit an emulation result that we didn't expect, that is an error,
but it's nothing that warrants
16 matches
Mail list logo
