On 18.01.2013, at 04:05, Scott Wood wrote:
On 01/17/2013 08:34:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we invalidate shadow TLB maps on the host, we don't mark them
as not valid. But we should.
Fix this by removing the E500_TLB_VALID from their flags when
invalidating.
Signed-off-by: Alexander
On 01/18/2013 08:08:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.01.2013, at 04:05, Scott Wood wrote:
Invalidation paths that call kvmppc_e500_tlbil_all(), such as
MMUCSR0 and tlbivax, need a call to clear_tlb_refs() in order to get
the valid bits cleared.
Yeah, instead of
On 18.01.2013, at 04:05, Scott Wood wrote:
On 01/17/2013 08:34:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we invalidate shadow TLB maps on the host, we don't mark them
as not valid. But we should.
Fix this by removing the E500_TLB_VALID from their flags when
invalidating.
Signed-off-by: Alexander
When we invalidate shadow TLB maps on the host, we don't mark them
as not valid. But we should.
Fix this by removing the E500_TLB_VALID from their flags when
invalidating.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_tlb.c | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 10
On 01/17/2013 08:34:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we invalidate shadow TLB maps on the host, we don't mark them
as not valid. But we should.
Fix this by removing the E500_TLB_VALID from their flags when
invalidating.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
On 01/17/2013 08:34:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
When we invalidate shadow TLB maps on the host, we don't mark them
as not valid. But we should.
Fix this by removing the E500_TLB_VALID from their flags when
invalidating.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
