On Oct 3, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2014-10-02 17:52+0300, Nadav Amit:
>>> 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit:
NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and
0x instead of checking the logical address.
> [...]
>> Please don’t apply this patc
2014-10-02 17:52+0300, Nadav Amit:
> > 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit:
> >> NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and
> >> 0x instead of checking the logical address.
[...]
> Please don’t apply this patch (only this one - 3/6).
> I observe strange behaviour
On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:58 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit:
>> NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and
>> 0x instead of checking the logical address. Currently there are no
>> instructions which are marked with NoBigReal flag, so t
2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit:
> NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and
> 0x instead of checking the logical address. Currently there are no
> instructions which are marked with NoBigReal flag, so this bug currently has
> no
> impact.
(Would be nice if
NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and
0x instead of checking the logical address. Currently there are no
instructions which are marked with NoBigReal flag, so this bug currently has no
impact.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 ++--