Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: NoBigReal was mistakenly considering la instead of ea

2014-10-06 Thread Nadav Amit
On Oct 3, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote: > 2014-10-02 17:52+0300, Nadav Amit: >>> 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit: NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and 0x instead of checking the logical address. > [...] >> Please don’t apply this patc

Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: NoBigReal was mistakenly considering la instead of ea

2014-10-03 Thread Radim Krčmář
2014-10-02 17:52+0300, Nadav Amit: > > 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit: > >> NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and > >> 0x instead of checking the logical address. [...] > Please don’t apply this patch (only this one - 3/6). > I observe strange behaviour

Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: NoBigReal was mistakenly considering la instead of ea

2014-10-02 Thread Nadav Amit
On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:58 PM, Radim Krčmář wrote: > 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit: >> NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and >> 0x instead of checking the logical address. Currently there are no >> instructions which are marked with NoBigReal flag, so t

Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: NoBigReal was mistakenly considering la instead of ea

2014-10-01 Thread Radim Krčmář
2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit: > NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and > 0x instead of checking the logical address. Currently there are no > instructions which are marked with NoBigReal flag, so this bug currently has > no > impact. (Would be nice if

[PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: NoBigReal was mistakenly considering la instead of ea

2014-09-30 Thread Nadav Amit
NoBigReal emulation should consider the effective address is between 0 and 0x instead of checking the logical address. Currently there are no instructions which are marked with NoBigReal flag, so this bug currently has no impact. Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit --- arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 ++--