Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: s390: fix sigp set prefix status stored cases

2012-06-26 Thread Alexander Graf
Am 26.06.2012 um 17:39 schrieb Cornelia Huck : > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:56:08 +0200 > Alexander Graf wrote: > >> >> On 26.06.2012, at 16:06, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> >>> From: Heiko Carstens >>> >>> If an invalid parameter is passed or the addressed cpu is in an >>> incorrect state sigp set

Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: s390: fix sigp set prefix status stored cases

2012-06-26 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:56:08 +0200 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 26.06.2012, at 16:06, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > From: Heiko Carstens > > > > If an invalid parameter is passed or the addressed cpu is in an > > incorrect state sigp set prefix will store a status. > > This status must only have

Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: s390: fix sigp set prefix status stored cases

2012-06-26 Thread Alexander Graf
On 26.06.2012, at 16:06, Cornelia Huck wrote: > From: Heiko Carstens > > If an invalid parameter is passed or the addressed cpu is in an > incorrect state sigp set prefix will store a status. > This status must only have bits set as defined by the architecture. > The current kvm implementation

[PATCH 4/6] KVM: s390: fix sigp set prefix status stored cases

2012-06-26 Thread Cornelia Huck
From: Heiko Carstens If an invalid parameter is passed or the addressed cpu is in an incorrect state sigp set prefix will store a status. This status must only have bits set as defined by the architecture. The current kvm implementation missed to clear bits and also did not set the intended statu