On 2012-07-18 11:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-07-18 03:54, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 07/06/2012 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
>>> On 2012-07-06 11:41, Wen Congyang wrote:
If the target is x86/x86_64, the guest's kernel will write 0x01 to the
port KVM_PV_PORT when it is panciked. This pat
On 2012-07-18 03:54, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 07/06/2012 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
>> On 2012-07-06 11:41, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> If the target is x86/x86_64, the guest's kernel will write 0x01 to the
>>> port KVM_PV_PORT when it is panciked. This patch introduces a new qom
>>> device kvm_pv_iop
At 07/06/2012 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
> On 2012-07-06 11:41, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> If the target is x86/x86_64, the guest's kernel will write 0x01 to the
>> port KVM_PV_PORT when it is panciked. This patch introduces a new qom
>> device kvm_pv_ioport to listen this I/O port, and deal with pani
On 2012-07-06 11:41, Wen Congyang wrote:
> If the target is x86/x86_64, the guest's kernel will write 0x01 to the
> port KVM_PV_PORT when it is panciked. This patch introduces a new qom
> device kvm_pv_ioport to listen this I/O port, and deal with panicked
> event according to panicked_action's val
If the target is x86/x86_64, the guest's kernel will write 0x01 to the
port KVM_PV_PORT when it is panciked. This patch introduces a new qom
device kvm_pv_ioport to listen this I/O port, and deal with panicked
event according to panicked_action's value. The possible actions are:
1. emit QEVENT_GUES
