Re: [PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

2013-06-27 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 06/26/2013 02:03 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: On 06/24/2013 06:47 PM, Andrew Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:10:14PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: Results: === base = 3.10-rc2 kernel patched = base + this series The test was on 32 core (model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7560) HT

Re: [PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

2013-06-26 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 06/24/2013 06:47 PM, Andrew Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:10:14PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: Results: === base = 3.10-rc2 kernel patched = base + this series The test was on 32 core (model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7560) HT disabled with 32 KVM guest vcpu 8GB RAM. Have you

[PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

2013-06-24 Thread Raghavendra K T
This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. The series provides implementation for both Xen and KVM. Changes in V10: Addressed Konrad's review comments: - Added break in patch 5 since now we know exact cpu to wakeup - Dropped

Re: [PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

2013-06-24 Thread Andrew Jones
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:10:14PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: Results: === base = 3.10-rc2 kernel patched = base + this series The test was on 32 core (model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7560) HT disabled with 32 KVM guest vcpu 8GB RAM. Have you ever tried to get results with HT

Re: [PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

2013-06-24 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 06/24/2013 06:47 PM, Andrew Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:10:14PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: Results: === base = 3.10-rc2 kernel patched = base + this series The test was on 32 core (model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7560) HT disabled with 32 KVM guest vcpu 8GB RAM. Have you