On 04/22/2010 11:57 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
And about x86_32 copy_in_user().
They are using copy_user_generic() which is implemented only for 64bit.
So I'll show them current copy_from_user() and copy_to_user() version and
see their response.
If rejected, though I hope not, please give me
(2010/04/21 20:12), Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/20/2010 01:59 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
We will replace copy_to_user() to copy_in_user() when we move
the dirty bitmaps to user space.
But sadly, we have copy_in_user() only for 64 bits architectures.
So this function should work as a wrapper to hid
On 04/20/2010 01:59 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
We will replace copy_to_user() to copy_in_user() when we move
the dirty bitmaps to user space.
But sadly, we have copy_in_user() only for 64 bits architectures.
So this function should work as a wrapper to hide ifdefs from outside.
Once we get copy
We will replace copy_to_user() to copy_in_user() when we move
the dirty bitmaps to user space.
But sadly, we have copy_in_user() only for 64 bits architectures.
So this function should work as a wrapper to hide ifdefs from outside.
Once we get copy_in_user() for 32 bits architectures, we can remov