On 08/08/2012 11:09 AM, Asias He wrote:
On 08/07/2012 05:16 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:47:13PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Hi, all
This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by
Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:47:13PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
2) Fusion IO device
With bio-based IO path,