On 27.01.2012, at 22:49, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-27 21:48, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 01/17/2012 12:27 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
>>> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report
>>> spurious
>>> soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being
>>> d
On 2012-01-27 21:48, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 12:27 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
>> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report
>> spurious
>> soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being
>> discussed that
>> will give the host the ability to tel
On 01/17/2012 12:27 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed that
will give the host the ability to tell the guest that it is being stopped and
should ignore the
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
> soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed that
> will give the host the ability to tell the guest that it is being stopped and
> should ignore
Often when a guest is stopped from the qemu console, it will report spurious
soft lockup warnings on resume. There are kernel patches being discussed that
will give the host the ability to tell the guest that it is being stopped and
should ignore the soft lockup warning that generates. This patch
