On 08/14/2013 01:32 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
Ingo, below delta patch should fix it, IIRC, I hope you will be folding this
back to patch 14/14 itself. Else please let me.
I have already run allnoconfig, allyesconfig, randconfig with below patch. But
will
test again.
I Did 2 more runs of ally
On 08/14/2013 01:30 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 08/13/2013 01:02 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
[...]
Ingo, below delta patch should fix it, IIRC, I hope you will be folding this
back to patch 14/14 itself. Else please let me.
it was.. s/Please let me know/
[...]
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(st
On 08/13/2013 01:02 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar [2013-08-13 18:55:52]:
>
>> Would be nice to have a delta fix patch against tip:x86/spinlocks, which
>> I'll then backmerge into that series via rebasing it.
>>
> There was a namespace collision of PER_CPU lock_waiting variable when
>
* Ingo Molnar [2013-08-13 18:55:52]:
> Would be nice to have a delta fix patch against tip:x86/spinlocks, which
> I'll then backmerge into that series via rebasing it.
>
There was a namespace collision of PER_CPU lock_waiting variable when
we have both Xen and KVM enabled.
Perhaps this week
