Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/6] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog

2015-12-14 16:05-0600, Andrew Jones: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:24:18PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c >> @@ -291,7 +292,7 @@ static void check_counters_many(void) >> if (!verify_counter([i])) >> break; >> >> -report("all

Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/6] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:01:01PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > 2015-12-14 16:05-0600, Andrew Jones: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:24:18PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > >> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c > >> @@ -291,7 +292,7 @@ static void check_counters_many(void) > >>if

Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/6] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:24:18PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > Host's nmi_watchdog takes one slot, making the "all counters" unit-test > fail. We know exactly what happens, mark it as expected failure. > > PMU test is now executed regardless of host_nmi_watchdog. > > Signed-off-by: Radim

[PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/6] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog

Host's nmi_watchdog takes one slot, making the "all counters" unit-test fail. We know exactly what happens, mark it as expected failure. PMU test is now executed regardless of host_nmi_watchdog. Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář --- x86/pmu.c | 9 -