On 04/14/2013 09:40 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> On 03/20/2013 03:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:58:56PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 20
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 03:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:58:56PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >> On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:09:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>
On 03/20/2013 03:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:58:56PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:09:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Some tests want extra arguments as enumerated in unittests.cfg,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 07:58:56PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:09:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >> Some tests want extra arguments as enumerated in unittests.cfg,
> >> use them.
> >>
> >> unittests.cfg also has a few
On 03/17/2013 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:09:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Some tests want extra arguments as enumerated in unittests.cfg,
>> use them.
>>
>> unittests.cfg also has a few sections about invoking certains tests
>> with different combinations of op
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:09:09PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Some tests want extra arguments as enumerated in unittests.cfg,
> use them.
>
> unittests.cfg also has a few sections about invoking certains tests
> with different combinations of options, but x86-run doesn't do
> anything with that
Some tests want extra arguments as enumerated in unittests.cfg,
use them.
unittests.cfg also has a few sections about invoking certains tests
with different combinations of options, but x86-run doesn't do
anything with that.
---
x86-run | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)