On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:34:54AM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:44:11PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > Physical Function driver patches for Intel 82576 NIC are available:
> > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8063/
> > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8064/
> > >
Yang, Sheng wrote:
Patches 2 and 3 of the patchset that enables SR/IOV in kvm [1] suggest
that at the config space is only partially implemented.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/29034
Hi Avi
For kernel side, patch 2 is not necessary. Because kernel would read
On Monday 09 March 2009 11:42:05 Yang, Sheng wrote:
> On Sunday 08 March 2009 22:30:16 Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> Do those patches allow using a VF on the host (in other words, does
> > >> the kernel emulate c
On Sunday 08 March 2009 22:30:16 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> Do those patches allow using a VF on the host (in other words, does the
> >> kernel emulate config space accesses)?
> >
> > SR-IOV hardware handles config
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:01:09AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 04:30:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >>Do those patches allow using a VF on the host (in other words, does the
> >
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 04:30:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>Do those patches allow using a VF on the host (in other words, does the
> >>kernel emulate config space accesses)?
> >
> >SR-IOV hardware handles c
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Do those patches allow using a VF on the host (in other words, does the
kernel emulate config space accesses)?
SR-IOV hardware handles config space accesses to virtual functions. No
kernel changes needed
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:44:11PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Physical Function driver patches for Intel 82576 NIC are available:
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8063/
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8064/
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8065/
> > http://patchwork.ke
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:54:41PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
> Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
> the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which
> will benefit KVM and achieve oth
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Do those patches allow using a VF on the host (in other words, does the
> kernel emulate config space accesses)?
SR-IOV hardware handles config space accesses to virtual functions. No
kernel changes needed for that aspect of it.
--
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 06:47:38PM +0800, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Yu Zhao wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
> > Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
> > the capability into multiple ones from software perspect
Yu Zhao wrote:
Greetings,
Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which
will benefit KVM and achieve other purposes such as QoS, security,
a
Greetings,
Following patches are intended to support SR-IOV capability in the
Linux kernel. With these patches, people can turn a PCI device with
the capability into multiple ones from software perspective, which
will benefit KVM and achieve other purposes such as QoS, security,
and etc.
SR-IOV s
13 matches
Mail list logo
