On Tue, 27 May 2008 11:24:08 +0530
Amit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2008 10:54:06 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > > An example with per-device dma_ops and stacking will look like this:
> > >
> > > pvdma->hardware->nommu/swiotlb
> > > ^ ^
> > >
> > > e1000
On Sunday 25 May 2008 12:50:11 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:13:02PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > OK; this sounds helpful. the hook can make a hypercall and confirm
> > with the host kernel if the device in question is an assigned
> > physical device. If yes, we replace the dma
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:13:02PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> OK; this sounds helpful. the hook can make a hypercall and confirm
> with the host kernel if the device in question is an assigned
> physical device. If yes, we replace the dma_ops. Though, the
> original intent of having stackable ops i
On Monday 19 May 2008 12:01:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This is an updated version of the patchset to add per-device
> dma_mapping_ops support for CONFIG_X86_64 like POWER architecture
> does:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/13/36
>
> This is against 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 (the changes since the v1 are pre
