Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:45:41AM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
My motivation: What I want to achive by this
work is to make the basic style of x86 emulator
better for the following developments. Actually
unless we handle the fault properly, our works
implementing each
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:57:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Patches 2-8 look fine, but I'd like Gleb to review them as well.
I will do, but I already see that they need to be rebased onto the
latest master.
--
Gleb.
Thank you! I will rebase my
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:45:41AM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
My motivation: What I want to achive by this
work is to make the basic style of x86 emulator
better for the following developments. Actually
unless we handle the fault properly, our works
implementing each instruction's
On 02/10/2010 03:45 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
This patch set consists of macro replacements
and some fixes of fault handling in the x86
emulator.
Suggested by Marcelo, I separated these two
works and tried to make it clear what effects
each patch will produce: if you think that
reordering
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:57:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/10/2010 03:45 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
This patch set consists of macro replacements
and some fixes of fault handling in the x86
emulator.
Suggested by Marcelo, I separated these two
works and tried to make it clear
This patch set consists of macro replacements
and some fixes of fault handling in the x86
emulator.
Suggested by Marcelo, I separated these two
works and tried to make it clear what effects
each patch will produce: if you think that
reordering something in this series makes your
maintainance
