From: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:40:54 +0300
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
If the size is larger than a max size of a skb, it means that we shouldn't
go ahead building
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 21:04 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:40:54PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
If the size is larger than a max size of a skb, it
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:50:54PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 21:04 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:40:54PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit
From: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:40:54 +0300
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
If the size is larger than a max size of a skb, it means that we shouldn't
go ahead building
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:19:51PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:40:54 +0300
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
If the size is larger than
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:40:54PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
If the size is larger than a max size of a skb, it means that we shouldn't
go ahead building skbs anyway since we
This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
If the size is larger than a max size of a skb, it means that we shouldn't
go ahead building skbs anyway since we won't be able to send the buffer as
the user requested.
Cc: Rusty
