Some trivial code cleanups not really related to nested EPT.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <n...@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 86e4022..914cdda 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -616,7 +616,6 @@ static void nested_release_page_clean(struct page *page)
 static u64 construct_eptp(unsigned long root_hpa);
 static void kvm_cpu_vmxon(u64 addr);
 static void kvm_cpu_vmxoff(void);
-static void vmx_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3);
 static int vmx_set_tss_addr(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int addr);
 static void vmx_set_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
                            struct kvm_segment *var, int seg);
@@ -912,8 +911,7 @@ static inline bool nested_cpu_has2(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12, 
u32 bit)
                (vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control & bit);
 }
 
-static inline bool nested_cpu_has_virtual_nmis(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
-       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline bool nested_cpu_has_virtual_nmis(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
 {
        return vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control & PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS;
 }
@@ -6321,7 +6319,7 @@ static int vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
        if (unlikely(!cpu_has_virtual_nmis() && vmx->soft_vnmi_blocked &&
            !(is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_cpu_has_virtual_nmis(
-                                       get_vmcs12(vcpu), vcpu)))) {
+                                       get_vmcs12(vcpu))))) {
                if (vmx_interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
                        vmx->soft_vnmi_blocked = 0;
                } else if (vmx->vnmi_blocked_time > 1000000000LL &&
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to