On 13.01.2012, at 07:09, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than
On 01/16/2012 03:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Avi?
ACK!
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 13.01.2012, at 07:09, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:30:41PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Which tree is this against? I got this diff between your patch and the patch
when applied on my tree:
It's against your tree (previously) plus my first 13-patch series, but
not the second series of 5 patches, which presumably why
On 13.01.2012, at 07:09, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than
On 01/16/2012 03:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Avi?
ACK!
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 13.01.2012, at 07:09, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:30:41PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Which tree is this against? I got this diff between your patch and the patch
when applied on my tree:
It's against your tree (previously) plus my first 13-patch series, but
not the second series of 5 patches, which presumably why
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than putting gfn_to_memslot() itself in a header, which
This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
Rather than putting gfn_to_memslot() itself in a header, which
10 matches
Mail list logo