Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:04 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
@@ -286,6 +289,9 @@ kvm_context_t kvm_init(struct kvm_callbacks *callbacks,
int fd;
kvm_context_t kvm;
int r;
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
We're currently using a counter to track the most recent GSI we've
handed out. This quickly hits KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES when using device
assignment with a driver that regularly toggles the MSI enable bit.
BTW, dwhich driver does
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
We're currently using a counter to track the most recent GSI we've
handed out. This quickly hits KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES when using device
assignment with a driver that regularly toggles the MSI enable bit.
This can mean only a few
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:03 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
We're currently using a counter to track the most recent GSI we've
handed out. This quickly hits KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES when using device
assignment with a driver that
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:04 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
@@ -286,6 +289,9 @@ kvm_context_t kvm_init(struct kvm_callbacks *callbacks,
int fd;
kvm_context_t kvm;
int r;
+#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
Let's
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 21:42 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:30 +0800, Yang, Sheng wrote:
+ kvm-used_gsi_bitmap = malloc(gsi_bytes);
+ if (!kvm-used_gsi_bitmap) {
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(kvm-gsi_mutex);
+ goto out_close;
+ }
+
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 12:10:34 Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 21:42 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:30 +0800, Yang, Sheng wrote:
+ kvm-used_gsi_bitmap = malloc(gsi_bytes);
+ if (!kvm-used_gsi_bitmap) {
+
