Re: [PATCH v3 -next 5/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality

2014-07-17 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 2014-06-16 07:40, Joonsoo Kim wrote: Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA subsystem and the other is the KVM on powerpc. They have their own code to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar. From my guess, it is caused by some needs on

Re: [PATCH v3 -next 5/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality

2014-07-17 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 2014-06-16 07:40, Joonsoo Kim wrote: Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA subsystem and the other is the KVM on powerpc. They have their own code to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar. From my guess, it is caused by some needs on

[PATCH v3 -next 5/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality

2014-06-15 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA subsystem and the other is the KVM on powerpc. They have their own code to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar. From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. KVM side wants to maintain

[PATCH v3 -next 5/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality

2014-06-15 Thread Joonsoo Kim
Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA subsystem and the other is the KVM on powerpc. They have their own code to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar. From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. KVM side wants to maintain