On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:42:53AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-07-02:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 17:15, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb
-Original Message-
From: Gleb Natapov [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 8:38 PM
To: Zhang, Yang Z
Cc: Jan Kiszka; Paolo Bonzini; Nakajima, Jun; kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit
controls for L1
On Thu, Jul
] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit
controls for L1
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:42:53AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-07-02:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 17:15, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04
Gleb Natapov wrote on 2013-07-02:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 17:15, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +, Zhang, Yang Z
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Since this series is pending in mail list for long time. And it's really a
big feature for Nested. Also, I doubt the original authors(Jun and
Nahav)should not have enough time to continue it. So I will pick it up. :)
See
On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Since this series is pending in mail list for long time. And it's really a
big feature for Nested. Also, I doubt the original authors(Jun and
Nahav)should not have enough time to continue
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Since this series is pending in mail list for long time. And it's really a
big feature for Nested. Also, I doubt the original
On 2013-07-02 17:15, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Since this series is pending in mail list for long time. And it's really a
big feature
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 17:15, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-07-02 15:59, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:24AM +, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Since this series is
Since this series is pending in mail list for long time. And it's really a big
feature for Nested. Also, I doubt the original authors(Jun and Nahav)should not
have enough time to continue it. So I will pick it up. :)
See comments below:
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2013-05-20:
Il 19/05/2013 06:52,
Il 19/05/2013 06:52, Jun Nakajima ha scritto:
From: Nadav Har'El n...@il.ibm.com
Recent KVM, since http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2010/5/2/6261577
switch the EFER MSR when EPT is used and the host and guest have different
NX bits. So if we add support for nested EPT (L1 guest
From: Nadav Har'El n...@il.ibm.com
Recent KVM, since http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2010/5/2/6261577
switch the EFER MSR when EPT is used and the host and guest have different
NX bits. So if we add support for nested EPT (L1 guest using EPT to run L2)
and want to be able to run
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Please use --no-chain-reply-to option to git send-email for nicer
email threading and there is something wrong with Signed-off chain for
the patches. The first Signed-off-by: is by Nadav, but you appears to be
the author of
Please use --no-chain-reply-to option to git send-email for nicer
email threading and there is something wrong with Signed-off chain for
the patches. The first Signed-off-by: is by Nadav, but you appears to be
the author of the patches for git. AFAIK Nadav is the author, so you
need to add proper
Recent KVM, since http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2010/5/2/6261577
switch the EFER MSR when EPT is used and the host and guest have different
NX bits. So if we add support for nested EPT (L1 guest using EPT to run L2)
and want to be able to run recent KVM as L1, we need to allow L1 to
15 matches
Mail list logo
