On 01/20/2011 05:27 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Before patch:
real5m6.493s
user3m57.847s
sys 9m7.115s
real5m1.750s
user4m0.109s
sys 9m10.192s
After patch:
real5m0.140s
user3m57.956s
sys 8m58.339s
real4m56.314s
user4m0.303s
On 01/20/2011 11:27 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Sure :-), there is the simply test result of kernbench:
Before patch:
real5m6.493s
user3m57.847s
sys
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:03:31AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 01/20/2011 02:13 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Fix:
[ 1001.499596]
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Fix:
[ 1001.499596] ===
[ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1001.499601]
On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Fix:
[ 1001.499596] ===
[ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1001.499601] ---
[ 1001.499604]
Fix:
[ 1001.499596] ===
[ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1001.499601] ---
[ 1001.499604] include/linux/kvm_host.h:301 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
without
