On 01/20/2011 05:27 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Before patch:
>
> real5m6.493s
> user3m57.847s
> sys 9m7.115s
>
> real5m1.750s
> user4m0.109s
> sys 9m10.192s
>
>
> After patch:
> real5m0.140s
> user3m57.956s
> sys 8m58.339s
>
> real4m56.314s
>
On 01/20/2011 11:27 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Sure :-), there is the simply test result of kernbench:
>>
>> Before patch:
>>
>> real5m6.493s
>>
>> user3m57.847s
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:03:31AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 02:13 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>> Fix:
> >>>
> >>> [ 1001.499596] =
On 01/20/2011 02:13 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>> Fix:
>>>
>>> [ 1001.499596] ===
>>> [ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > Fix:
> >
> > [ 1001.499596] ===
> > [ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > [ 1001.499601]
On 01/12/2011 03:39 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Fix:
>
> [ 1001.499596] ===
> [ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 1001.499601] ---
> [ 1001.499604] include/linux/kvm_h
Fix:
[ 1001.499596] ===
[ 1001.499599] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1001.499601] ---
[ 1001.499604] include/linux/kvm_host.h:301 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
without protect
