On 05/21/2013 09:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:21:06AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
On 05/21/2013 08:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:01:26PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
Because not all 256 CP0 registers are ever implemented, we need
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:21:06AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 08:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:01:26PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >>From: David Daney
> >>
> >>Because not all 256 CP0 registers are ever implemented, we need a
> >>different method of manipu
On 05/21/2013 08:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:01:26PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney
Because not all 256 CP0 registers are ever implemented, we need a
different method of manipulating them. Use the
KVM_GET_MSRS/KVM_SET_MSRS mechanism as x86 does for its M
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:01:26PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> Because not all 256 CP0 registers are ever implemented, we need a
> different method of manipulating them. Use the
> KVM_GET_MSRS/KVM_SET_MSRS mechanism as x86 does for its MSRs.
>
Have you looked at KVM_(GET|S
From: David Daney
Because not all 256 CP0 registers are ever implemented, we need a
different method of manipulating them. Use the
KVM_GET_MSRS/KVM_SET_MSRS mechanism as x86 does for its MSRs.
Code related to implementing KVM_GET_MSRS/KVM_SET_MSRS is consolidated
in to kvm_trap_emul.c, now unus
