On 11/19/2010 11:04 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Introduce a common function to map invalid gpte
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrongxiaoguangr...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |3 --
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 71 +++-
2 files changed,
On 11/22/2010 05:28 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
+static bool FNAME(map_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
+pt_element_t gpte)
It's really only for speculative maps, the name should reflect that.
OK, i'll use
On 11/22/2010 12:18 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
I think the order is reversed. If !is_present_gpte(), it doesn't matter
if reserved bits are set or not.
if !is_present_gpte() is_rsvd_bits_set, then we may mark the spte notrap,
so the guest will detect #PF with PFEC.P=PEFC.RSVD=0, but the
version and it use prefetch_invalid_gpte instead of
map_invalid_gpte
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: MMU: abstract invalid guest pte mapping
From: Xiao Guangrong xiaoguangr...@cn.fujitsu.com
Introduce a common function to map invalid gpte
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong xiaoguangr...@cn.fujitsu.com
Introduce a common function to map invalid gpte
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong xiaoguangr...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |3 --
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 71 +++-
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git
