Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
How virtio implementations should determine their endianness is
a spec question, I think; at any rate QEMU and kvmtool ought to
agree on how it's done. I think the most recent suggestion on the
QEMU mailing list
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
+reg.addr =
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
wrote:
On Thu,
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:42:54 am BST, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06
On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:42:54 am BST, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier
On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
Current opinion on the qemu-devel thread seems to be that we
should just define that the endianness of the virtio device is
the endianness of
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:55:45 am BST, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:11:13PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:42:54 am BST, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:11:13 am BST, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 05/07/2014 11:57 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Huh? What if my guest has usespace using an idmap, with Stage-1 MMU for
isolation only (much like an MPU)? R-class guests anyone?
Agreed, this is not the general use case,
On Wed, 07 May 2014 10:52:01 +0100
Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:10:56 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
Current opinion on the qemu-devel thread seems to be that
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2014 10:52:01 +0100
Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 6 May 2014 19:38, Peter Maydell
On 05/07/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:10:56 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
Current
On 07/05/14 12:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05/07/2014 12:46 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:10:56 am BST, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 May 2014 10:52, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 10:34:30 am BST, Peter Maydell
On 7 May 2014 12:04, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
All the fuzz is not really about enforcing kernel access... PPC also
has a current endianness selector (MSR_LE) but it only makes sense
if you are
On 7 May 2014 13:16, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
That being said, I'm going to stop replying to this thread, and instead
go back writing code, posting it, and getting on with my life in
virtio-legacy land.
Some of us are trying to have a conversation in this thread
about
On 07/05/14 13:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 7 May 2014 12:04, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
All the fuzz is not really about enforcing kernel access... PPC also
has a current endianness selector
On Wed, 7 May 2014 13:17:51 +0100
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 7 May 2014 12:04, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, May 07 2014 at 11:40:54 am BST, Greg Kurz
gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
All the fuzz is not really about enforcing kernel access... PPC
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Implement the kcm_cpu__get_endianness call for both AArch32 and
s/kcm/kvm/
AArch64, and advertise the bi-endianness support.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
---
tools/kvm/arm/aarch32/kvm-cpu.c
Hi Will,
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Implement the kcm_cpu__get_endianness call for both AArch32 and
s/kcm/kvm/
Are you saying that I hace fat fingers? ;-)
AArch64,
On 6 May 2014 18:25, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 3:28:07 pm BST, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
+reg.addr = (u64)data;
+if (ioctl(vcpu-vcpu_fd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, reg) 0)
+
Implement the kcm_cpu__get_endianness call for both AArch32 and
AArch64, and advertise the bi-endianness support.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
---
tools/kvm/arm/aarch32/kvm-cpu.c | 14 +
tools/kvm/arm/aarch64/include/kvm/kvm-cpu-arch.h | 2 ++
24 matches
Mail list logo
