On 30 September 2014 14:26, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Anup,
>
> thanks for the re-spin and sorry for the delay.
>
> Looks better now, some minor comments below.
>
> On 19/09/14 00:57, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Instead, of trying out each and every target type we should
>> use KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET
Hi Anup,
thanks for the re-spin and sorry for the delay.
Looks better now, some minor comments below.
On 19/09/14 00:57, Anup Patel wrote:
> Instead, of trying out each and every target type we should
> use KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET vm ioctl to determine target type
> for KVM ARM/ARM64.
>
> If K
Instead, of trying out each and every target type we should
use KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET vm ioctl to determine target type
for KVM ARM/ARM64.
If KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET vm ioctl fails then we fallback to
old method of trying all known target types.
If KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET vm ioctl succeeds b
