On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 16 January 2013 18:00, Christoffer Dall
>> wrote:
>>> KVM: ARM: Introduce KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS ioctl
>>
>> Patch subject needs updating with new name of this ioctl
>> (KVM_
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 16 January 2013 18:00, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
>> KVM: ARM: Introduce KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS ioctl
>
> Patch subject needs updating with new name of this ioctl
> (KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR)...
>
>> On ARM (and possibly other architecture
On 16 January 2013 18:00, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> KVM: ARM: Introduce KVM_SET_DEVICE_ADDRESS ioctl
Patch subject needs updating with new name of this ioctl
(KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR)...
> On ARM (and possibly other architectures) some bits are specific to the
> model being emulated for the gues
On ARM (and possibly other architectures) some bits are specific to the
model being emulated for the guest and user space needs a way to tell
the kernel about those bits. An example is mmio device base addresses,
where KVM must know the base address for a given device to properly
emulate mmio acce
