On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:22:45AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:52:19PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I also have an ulterior motive here. If the boot order is exposed as
a newline separated list via an entry in QEMU_CFG_FILE_DIR, then this
becomes free for coreboot
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:29:24PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/11/15 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:50:13PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:54:27PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/11/16 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:30:19PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Perhaps the FW path should use device class names if no name is
specified.
What do you mean by device class name. We can do
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:18:27PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:54:27PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/11/16 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:30:19PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Perhaps the FW path should use device class names if no name is
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:38:31PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:18:27PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:54:27PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/11/16 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:30:19PM +, Blue Swirl
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:45:04PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:38:31PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:18:27PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:54:27PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/11/16 Gleb Natapov
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:52:30PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:45:04PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:38:31PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:18:27PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:16:05PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:52:30PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:45:04PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:38:31PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:16:05PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:52:30PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:45:04PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:37:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
So that's unavoidable if we think paths are correct.
But if we know they are wrong, we are better off
correcting them first IMO.
They are correct for x86. My patch set does not even tries to cover all
HW. If sparc want to use
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:12:02PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:37:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
So that's unavoidable if we think paths are correct.
But if we know they are wrong, we are better off
correcting them first IMO.
They are correct for
2010/11/16 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:30:19PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Perhaps the FW path should use device class names if no name is specified.
What do you mean by device class name. We can do something like this:
if (dev-child_bus.lh_first)
return
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:52:19PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:26:35AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at
2010/11/16 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:29:24PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
2010/11/15 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:50:13PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:30:19PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
Perhaps the FW path should use device class names if no name is specified.
What do you mean by device class name. We can do something like this:
if (dev-child_bus.lh_first)
return dev-child_bus.lh_first-info-name;
i.e
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:53:50AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:40:33PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
+/*
+ * This function
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:50:13PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h | 4 +++-
sysemu.h | 1 +
vl.c | 51
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:40:33PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Why not just return a newline separated list that is null terminated?
Doing it like this will needlessly complicate firmware side. How do you
know how much memory
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:26:35AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:40:33PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Why not just return a newline separated list that is null terminated?
Doing it like this will
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Hmm BTW I do not see proper endianness
handling in FILE_DIR.
That's just me. Everything it OK there with endianness.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
2010/11/15 Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:50:13PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h | 4 +++-
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:26:35AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:40:33PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Why not just return a newline
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:52:19PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:26:35AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:40:33PM
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h |4 +++-
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c| 51 +++
4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/fw_cfg.c b/hw/fw_cfg.c
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h |4 +++-
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c| 51 +++
4 files changed, 69
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:41:37PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h |4 +++-
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c| 51
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h | 4 +++-
sysemu.h | 1 +
vl.c | 51 +++
4 files changed,
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:49:59PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h | 4 +++-
sysemu.h | 1 +
vl.c | 51
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:52:37PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:41:37PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:52:37PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
+
+len = strlen(bootpath);
+list = qemu_realloc(list, total + len + 1);
+list[total++] = len;
+memcpy(list[total], bootpath, len);
+total += len;
+c++;
+
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:49:59PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:13:03PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:49:59PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
---
hw/fw_cfg.c | 14 ++
hw/fw_cfg.h | 4 +++-
sysemu.h | 1 +
vl.c | 51 +++
4 files changed,
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
+/*
+ * This function returns device list as an array in a below format:
+ * +-+-+---+-+---+--
+ * | n | l1 | devpath1| l2 | devpath2 | ...
+ *
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:40:33PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:39:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
+/*
+ * This function returns device list as an array in a below format:
+ *
35 matches
Mail list logo
