On 17.06.2012 17:14, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 04:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>>> strtosz() is much too general. We could do it in vl.c without trouble.
>>> However, it takes away our ability to emulate a "640k should be enough
>>> for everyone" machine.
>>
>> Then how about current max o
On 06/17/2012 04:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> strtosz() is much too general. We could do it in vl.c without trouble.
>> However, it takes away our ability to emulate a "640k should be enough
>> for everyone" machine.
>
> Then how about current max of target page sizes: 8k? No machine should
> wa
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 03:43 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2012 02:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>> I think this should rather go into generic code.
>
> To be honest, I put this
On 06/17/2012 03:43 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 06/17/2012 02:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> I think this should rather go into generic code.
To be honest, I put this in kvm-specific code because vl.c doesn't have
TARGET_PA
On 17 June 2012 13:43, Blue Swirl wrote:
> The boards should make sure that the amount of RAM is feasible with
> the board memory slots. It's not possible to put 256kb SIMMs to a slot
> that expects 1GB DIMMs. We can allow some flexibility there though,
> I'm not sure if the current chipsets would
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 02:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I think this should rather go into generic code.
>>>
>>> To be honest, I put this in kvm-specific code because vl.c doesn't have
>>> TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN. Maybe we should have machine->page_size
