On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/03/2011 08:45 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:38 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We could use a better agreement on the processor for making virtio
changes. Should it go (1) virtio spec (2) kernel (3) qemu, or should
On 11/03/2011 09:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/03/2011 08:45 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:38 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We could use a better agreement on the processor for making virtio
changes. Should it
On 11/03/2011 04:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
2. Proposed spec patch, kernel change, qemu change
3. Buy-ins from spec maintainer, kernel driver maintainer, qemu
device
maintainer (only regarding the ABI, not the code)
I don't think this is how it's working today. I would be happy
with a
