Il 28/02/2012 17:07, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> { 'enum': 'BlockdevOp',
> 'data': [ 'snapshot', 'snapshot-mirror', 'reopen' ] }
> { 'type': 'BlockdevAction',
> 'data': {'device': 'str', 'op': 'BlockdevOp',
>'file': 'str', '*format': 'str', '*reuse': 'bool',
>'*mirror': 'st
On 02/28/2012 07:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 28/02/2012 15:39, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>>> I'm not a fan of transactions or freeze/thaw (if used to atomically
>>> perform other commands).
>>>
>>> We should not export low-level blo
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/02/2012 15:39, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>> I'm not a fan of transactions or freeze/thaw (if used to atomically
>> perform other commands).
>>
>> We should not export low-level block device operations so that
>> external software can
Il 28/02/2012 15:39, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> I'm not a fan of transactions or freeze/thaw (if used to atomically
> perform other commands).
>
> We should not export low-level block device operations so that
> external software can micromanage via QMP. I don't think this is a
> good idea bec
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 03:58 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> Il 27/02/2012 18:21, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>> Given all the threads on snapshot/mirror/migrate/reopen in t
Il 27/02/2012 23:06, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>
> Thanks! One thing I'm having trouble following on your proposal: What
> commands are valid within
> blockdev-start-transaction/blockdev-commit-transaction?
>
> If I do:
>
> blockdev-start-transaction
> stop
> drive-reopen
> drive-mirror
> blo
On 02/27/2012 03:58 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2012 18:21, Eric Blake ha scritto:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Given all the threads on snapshot/mirror/migrate/reopen in the blockdev
layer, that sounds like a worthwhile topic to discuss on a phone call.
Il 27/02/2012 18:21, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> Given all the threads on snapshot/mirror/migrate/reopen in the blockdev
> layer, that sounds like a worthwhile topic to discuss on a phone call.
I put a description of the existing pr
On 02/27/2012 05:22 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Given all the threads on snapshot/mirror/migrate/reopen in the blockdev
layer, that sounds like a worthwhile topic to discuss on a phone call.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.c
