On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:41:53AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > KVM/qemu patches
> > - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
> > - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
> > - will slow
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> KVM/qemu patches
>>> - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
>>> - patches need to include bet
On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Can't hurt reviewer motivation. Could it be automated? Find replies,
> extract tags. If you want your acks to be picked up, you better make
> sure your References header works, and your tags are formatted
> correctly.
I think pwclient (https
2010/6/16 Markus Armbruster :
> Anthony Liguori writes:
>
>> On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>>>
KVM/qemu patches
- patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
- patches need to include be
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 06/15/2010 10:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
>>
>>> KVM/qemu patches
>>> - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
>>> - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
