Mike Burns wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael Goldish wrote:
Drawbacks:
- requires some initial work to be done by the user -- the user has
to define exactly where each test should run
For me, this is a major drawback. I'd really like a fire-and-forget
solution. If I have to
Ryan Harper wrote:
I took a slightly different approach. The kvm_tests.cfg file already
provides a dependency relationship between different tests. I modified
the main loop in the control file to walk the entire list of jobs and
pull out any jobs that don't have any dependencies (ie, install
* Mike Burns mbu...@redhat.com [2009-05-20 16:13]:
Ryan Harper wrote:
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-05-17 09:50]:
Hi all,
We've recently implemented a very simple form of parallel test
execution into KVM-Autotest and we'd like some feedback on it. This
suggestion
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-05-20 18:15]:
- Ryan Harper ry...@us.ibm.com wrote:
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-05-17 09:50]:
I took a slightly different approach. The kvm_tests.cfg file already
provides a dependency relationship between different tests.
Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael Goldish wrote:
Drawbacks:
- requires some initial work to be done by the user -- the user has
to define exactly where each test should run
For me, this is a major drawback. I'd really like a fire-and-forget
solution. If I have to spend my own time getting
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-05-17 09:50]:
Hi all,
We've recently implemented a very simple form of parallel test
execution into KVM-Autotest and we'd like some feedback on it. This
suggestion allows the user to manually assign tests to hosts/queues.
It also takes care of
Ryan Harper wrote:
* Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com [2009-05-17 09:50]:
Hi all,
We've recently implemented a very simple form of parallel test
execution into KVM-Autotest and we'd like some feedback on it. This
suggestion allows the user to manually assign tests to hosts/queues.
It
- Mike Burns mbu...@redhat.com wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Michael Goldish wrote:
Drawbacks:
- requires some initial work to be done by the user -- the user
has
to define exactly where each test should run
For me, this is a major drawback. I'd really like a
fire-and-forget
Hi all,
We've recently implemented a very simple form of parallel test execution into
KVM-Autotest and we'd like some feedback on it. This suggestion allows the user
to manually assign tests to hosts/queues. It also takes care of assigning
different MAC address ranges to hosts/queues. By
Michael Goldish wrote:
Drawbacks:
- requires some initial work to be done by the user -- the user has to define
exactly where each test should run
For me, this is a major drawback. I'd really like a fire-and-forget
solution. If I have to spend my own time getting this to work, vs.
10 matches
Mail list logo
