Avi Kivity wrote:
Glauber Costa wrote:
Hi folks,
Note that this is not tested in anything but x86.
Looks good. The current duplication of memory registration is very
annoying.
Yeah, I really like the way this series turned out. I agree that this
is the right thing to do.
Regards,
Glauber Costa wrote:
Hi folks,
The following series contain a proposal for our memory registration
framework. This is by no means complete, and rather, a first step only.
This first step, btw, has the goal of taking the kvm-specific memory
registration
functions from all over the code, so we c
Hi folks,
The following series contain a proposal for our memory registration
framework. This is by no means complete, and rather, a first step only.
This first step, btw, has the goal of taking the kvm-specific memory
registration
functions from all over the code, so we can make the merging wi