Re: [RFC 0/9] Memory registration rework

2008-08-13 Thread Anthony Liguori
Avi Kivity wrote: Glauber Costa wrote: Hi folks, Note that this is not tested in anything but x86. Looks good. The current duplication of memory registration is very annoying. Yeah, I really like the way this series turned out. I agree that this is the right thing to do. Regards,

Re: [RFC 0/9] Memory registration rework

2008-08-13 Thread Avi Kivity
Glauber Costa wrote: Hi folks, The following series contain a proposal for our memory registration framework. This is by no means complete, and rather, a first step only. This first step, btw, has the goal of taking the kvm-specific memory registration functions from all over the code, so we c

[RFC 0/9] Memory registration rework

2008-08-12 Thread Glauber Costa
Hi folks, The following series contain a proposal for our memory registration framework. This is by no means complete, and rather, a first step only. This first step, btw, has the goal of taking the kvm-specific memory registration functions from all over the code, so we can make the merging wi