Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] NUMA aware scheduling per vhost thread patch

2012-04-05 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:43:03AM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:09 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: Hi: Thanks for the work and it looks very reasonable, some questions below. Yes I am happy to see the per-cpu work resurrected. Some comments below. On 03/23/2012 07:48

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] NUMA aware scheduling per vhost thread patch

2012-03-27 Thread Jason Wang
Hi: Thanks for the work and it looks very reasonable, some questions below. On 03/23/2012 07:48 AM, Shirley Ma wrote: Sorry for being late to submit this patch. I have spent lots of time trying to find the best approach. This effort is still going on... This patch is built against net-next

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] NUMA aware scheduling per vhost thread patch

2012-03-27 Thread Shirley Ma
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:09 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: Hi: Thanks for the work and it looks very reasonable, some questions below. On 03/23/2012 07:48 AM, Shirley Ma wrote: Sorry for being late to submit this patch. I have spent lots of time trying to find the best approach. This effort

[RFC PATCH 0/1] NUMA aware scheduling per vhost thread patch

2012-03-22 Thread Shirley Ma
Sorry for being late to submit this patch. I have spent lots of time trying to find the best approach. This effort is still going on... This patch is built against net-next tree. This is an experimental RFC patch. The purpose of this patch is to address KVM networking scalability and NUMA