On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:43:03AM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:09 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Hi:
Thanks for the work and it looks very reasonable, some questions
below.
Yes I am happy to see the per-cpu work resurrected.
Some comments below.
On 03/23/2012 07:48
Hi:
Thanks for the work and it looks very reasonable, some questions below.
On 03/23/2012 07:48 AM, Shirley Ma wrote:
Sorry for being late to submit this patch. I have spent lots of time
trying to find the best approach. This effort is still going on...
This patch is built against net-next
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:09 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Hi:
Thanks for the work and it looks very reasonable, some questions
below.
On 03/23/2012 07:48 AM, Shirley Ma wrote:
Sorry for being late to submit this patch. I have spent lots of time
trying to find the best approach. This effort
Sorry for being late to submit this patch. I have spent lots of time
trying to find the best approach. This effort is still going on...
This patch is built against net-next tree.
This is an experimental RFC patch. The purpose of this patch is to
address KVM networking scalability and NUMA