On 1/10/2013 11:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:53:07PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:45:39PM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
Currenly mac is programmed byte by
From: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
Currenly mac is programmed byte by byte. This means that we
have an intermediate step where mac is wrong.
Second patch introduced a new vq control command to set mac
address in one time.
Amos Kong (2):
move virtnet_send_command() above
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:45:39PM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
Currenly mac is programmed byte by byte. This means that we
have an intermediate step where mac is wrong.
Second patch introduced a new vq control command to set mac
address in one time.
I
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:45:39PM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
Currenly mac is programmed byte by byte. This means that we
have an intermediate step where mac is wrong.
Second patch introduced a new vq control command to set mac
address in one time.
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:45:39PM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
Currenly mac is programmed byte by byte. This means that we
have an intermediate step where mac is wrong.
Second patch introduced a new vq
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:53:07PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:45:39PM +0800, ak...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com
Currenly mac is programmed byte by byte. This means that we
have an
