Hi Pranav,
On 21/01/14 12:17, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 20 January 2014 22:00, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Hi Anup,
>>>
>>> On 20/01/14 12:00, Anup Patel wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zy
Hi Marc,
On 20 January 2014 22:00, Anup Patel wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Anup,
>>
>> On 20/01/14 12:00, Anup Patel wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
In order to be able to detect the point where the guest e
Hi Marc,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Anup,
>
> On 20/01/14 12:00, Anup Patel wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> In order to be able to detect the point where the guest enables
>>> its MMU and caches, trap all the VM related system reg
Hi Anup,
On 20/01/14 12:00, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> In order to be able to detect the point where the guest enables
>> its MMU and caches, trap all the VM related system registers.
>>
>> Once we see the guest enabling both the MMU and the caches
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to be able to detect the point where the guest enables
> its MMU and caches, trap all the VM related system registers.
>
> Once we see the guest enabling both the MMU and the caches, we
> can go back to a saner mode of operation, whic
In order to be able to detect the point where the guest enables
its MMU and caches, trap all the VM related system registers.
Once we see the guest enabling both the MMU and the caches, we
can go back to a saner mode of operation, which is to leave these
registers in complete control of the guest.