On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:24PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
QEMU loads the unit test, but due to the way it translates the
unit test's linker VMA to the LMA, we can't just link such that
VMA == LMA. Thus, we link with VMA ==
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:24PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
QEMU loads the unit test, but due to the way it translates the
unit test's linker VMA to the LMA, we can't just link such that
VMA == LMA. Thus, we link with VMA ==
QEMU loads the unit test, but due to the way it translates the
unit test's linker VMA to the LMA, we can't just link such that
VMA == LMA. Thus, we link with VMA == 0x0, and then deal with
relocation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
configure | 2 ++
QEMU loads the unit test, but due to the way it translates the
unit test's linker VMA to the LMA, we can't just link such that
VMA == LMA. Thus, we link with VMA == 0x0, and then deal with
relocation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com
---
configure | 2 ++
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
QEMU loads the unit test, but due to the way it translates the
unit test's linker VMA to the LMA, we can't just link such that
VMA == LMA. Thus, we link with VMA == 0x0, and then deal with
relocation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
QEMU loads the unit test, but due to the way it translates the
unit test's linker VMA to the LMA, we can't just link such that
VMA == LMA. Thus, we link with VMA == 0x0, and then deal with
relocation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones
